The sensors monitored these and many other factors while four subjects were at work . At
random intervals,the subjects rated how interruptible they were on a scale ranging fromhighly
interruptibletohighly notinterruptible . Their ratings were then correlated with the various
behaviors . It is a shotgunapproach:we used all the indicators we could think of and
then let statistics find out which were important, says Hudson
The model showed that using the keyboard,and talking on a landline or to someone else in
the office correlated most strongly with how interruptible the subjects judged themselves to be.
Interestingly,the computer was actually better than people at predicting when someone was
too busy to be interrupted . The computer got it right 82 per cent of the time,humans 77 per cent.
Fogarty speculates that this might be because people doing the interrupting are inevitably biased
towards delivering their message,whereas computers dont care.
The first application for Hudson and Fogartys system is likely to be in an instant messaging system,followed by office phones and cellphones.There is no technological roadblock
to it being deployed in a couple of years, says Hudson
36 A big problem facing people today is that
【2015年职称英语理工类A级阅读理解练习(1)】相关文章:
★ 2014年职称英语(理工类)阅读理解中英文背诵模板(9)
★ 2015年职称英语考试《理工类》A级阅读理解范题精讲(3)
★ 2014年职称英语(理工类)阅读理解中英文背诵模板(17)
最新
2016-03-01
2016-03-01
2016-03-01
2016-03-01
2016-03-01
2016-03-01