缺点In trying to demonstrate the magnitude of this attitudinal change, however, Glatthaar seems to exaggerate the prewar racism of the White men who became officers in Black regiments. Prior to the war, he writes of these men, virtually all of them held powerful racial prejudices. While perhaps true of those officers who joined Black units for promotion or other 自私的目的, this statement misrepresents the attitudes of the many abolitionists who became officers in Black regiments. Having spent years fighting against the race prejudice 风土病 in American society, they participated eagerly in this military experiment, which they hoped would help African Americans achieve freedom and postwar civil equality. By current standards of 种族平均主义, these mens 家长式的作风 toward African Americans was racist. But to call their feelings powerful racial prejudices is to放纵,放任,滥用
历史沙文主义―to judge past eras by present standards.
1. The passage as a whole can best be characterized as which of the following?主题题
An evaluation of a scholarly study特别套路
A description of an attitudinal change
A discussion of an analytical defect
An analysis of the causes of a phenomenon
An argument in favor of revising a view
2. According to the author, which of the following is true of Glatthaars Forged in Battle compared with previous studies on the same topic2?信息题
【GRE阅读综合辅导:63题网络课堂总结(二十一)】相关文章:
最新
2016-03-01
2016-03-01
2016-03-01
2016-03-01
2016-03-01
2016-03-01