最后看一个No.9中Emily Bronte呼啸山庄前后部分是否统一的例子。这篇文章本身不仅学术含义很深,没有一定积累的考生较难理解。其文字难度也绝对不低。文中末尾提到:
However, any interpretation that seeks to unify all of the novels diverse element is bound to be somewhat unconvincing. This is not because such an interpretation necessarily stiffens into a thesis , but because Wuthering Heights has recalcitrant elements of undeniable power that, ultimately, resist inclusion in an all-encompassing interpretation.
这个例子是最能体现ETS出题点口味的,比上面的例子更具普遍意义。看文章后面问题:
The author of the passage would be most likely to agree that an interpretation of a novel should
not try to unite heterogeneous elements in the novel
not be inflexible in its treatment of the elements in the novel
not argue that the complex use of narrators or of time shifts indicates a sophisticated structure
concentrate on those recalcitrant elements of the novel that are outside the novels main structure
primarily consider those elements of novelistic construction of which the author of the novel was aware
这道题题干中的an和a提示了泛指化的题型。仔细阅读原文选段,不难发现这个离题的叙述内容出现在不成立的原因半句的括号中的让步语气中的延伸叙述部分。
【GRE阅读考试:难点答题技巧】相关文章:
最新
2016-03-01
2016-03-01
2016-03-01
2016-03-01
2016-03-01
2016-03-01