The writer probes each questionable assumption and offers alternative explanations, pointing out, for instance, that invitations for faculty to teach elsewhere may have been purposely arranged in order to temporarily remove them from campus and that the employed students may be flipping burgers and emptying wastebaskets.

　　In addition, the response perceptively analyzes many features -- omitted by the argument -- that could more convincingly make the case that Claria is the obvious choice.

　　The essay suggests that the search for a quality education would, at least, need to investigate the teaching strengths of the faculty; ideally one would also ask about research facilities, the universitys physical plant, availability of classes, even parking arrangements!

　　Although the fourth paragraph interrupts this discussion, the essay is, on the whole, logically and effectively organized.

　　Each paragraph develops the central premise: that the argument is uncompelling because it fails to use more valid indices of educational quality.

　　The writing is succinct, graceful, and virtually error-free, distinguished by impressive diction , as well as syntactic sophistication.

　　For all of these reasons, the essay earns a 6

【新gre作文官方范文分析第二篇】相关文章：

★ 新gre作文官方范文分析第一篇

★ 新版gre写作新题库：argument151

★ 新版gre作文新题库解析-issue26

★ GRE写作：Issue主题范文及评析2

★ 新版gre写作新题库：argument136

★ 作文重判成功经验分享

★ GRE官方Issue范文(二)

★ 新版gre写作新题库：argument145

★ 官方GRE argument 范文解析

★ GRE Issue作文范文