The author fails to demonstrate that the residential area on the opposite side of the city is suitable for industrial use.
The two areas may not be comparable at many aspects, thus taking similar action in the area may not generate the same good effects.
The author fails to substantiate the necessity of adapt more area for industrial use.
Taking the same action in the area may not sufficiently revitalize the city.
Other possible solutions could also be used to revitalize the city.
The author fails to consider the cost of the proposed action, and if the city could afford it.
Many factors that would influence the effectiveness of the action would have changed during the past decade.
The author fails to consider if the residents of the area are willing to be allocated to those houses and apartments.
注:题目中括号里的数字表明这句话体现的是提纲中第几号缺陷。
无论是gre issue还是gre argument,考生都应该养成写提纲的习惯。这种提纲式的gre写作练习可以帮助考生锻炼写作的逻辑性,而gre写作高分最重要的得分依据就是作文的逻辑性要强。
【gre argument230提纲分析汇总】相关文章:
最新
2016-03-01
2016-03-01
2016-03-01
2016-03-01
2016-03-01
2016-03-01