3. The reported depression rates may not reflect the actual status of mental health of people, many other factors could explain the lower reported rates.
4. The author unfairly attributes the lower incidence of depression in Japan and Taiwan to consuming large quantities of fish.
5. Even if eating fish is responsible for the lower depression rates, we cannot hastily assume that it is the omega-3 fatty acids contained in fish that result in the case.
6. Granted that eating a lot of fish do benefit Japanese and Taiwanese on their mental health, no evidence could ensure the same good effect will also occur among people in the United States through eating fish.
7. Omega-3 fatty acids are not necessarily contained only in fish, the author ignores many other solution to solve the problem.
8. Omega-3 fatty acids are not necessarily contained in all fish, thus consuming fish indiscriminatingly may not suffice to prevent depression.
9. The author fails to substantiate the assumption that all people in the United States need to consume a large amount of fish.
10.The author ignores the possibility that some Americans may not be willing to eat a lot of fish, some may not be fit for eating more fish, or some simply could not afford to do so.
注:题目中括号里的数字表明这句话体现的是提纲中第几号缺陷。
【gre argument187提纲分析汇总】相关文章:
最新
2016-03-01
2016-03-01
2016-03-01
2016-03-01
2016-03-01
2016-03-01