The authors assumption that a significant number of tourist will be willing to pay to visit a students dormitory is unwarranted.
The authors fails to consider the negative effect of attracting tourists to visit the dormitory, and if students will accept such activity.
The number of enrollments and donations from alumni would be influenced by many factors, thus merely constructing a new dorm might not sufficiently achieve the authors purpose.
The author fails to consider the feasibility and negative effect of converting part of the building into office space.
The author fails to demonstrate that Claitown University currently needs more office space.
注:题目中括号里的数字表明这句话体现的是提纲中第几号缺陷。
无论是gre issue还是gre argument,考生都应该养成写提纲的习惯。这种提纲式的gre写作练习可以帮助考生锻炼写作的逻辑性,而gre写作高分最重要的得分依据就是作文的逻辑性要强。
【gre argument164提纲分析汇总】相关文章:
最新
2016-03-01
2016-03-01
2016-03-01
2016-03-01
2016-03-01
2016-03-01