The chairperson fails to consider the possible differences between Bronston College and Pierce University, thus merely copying Bronstons activity may not be same effective at Pierce.

　　The chairperson fails to point out what fraction of our faculty will be new members, thus the assumption that the morale of entire staff could be improved is open to doubt.

　　The chairperson fails to consider many other relevant factors that may influence new professors decision.

　　Even if the proposed actions are effective in attracting new professors, we cannot guarantee that the action will attract the most gifted teachers and researchers, and necessarily improving the morale of stuff.

　　The chairperson does not analyze the cost of the proposed actions, hence we cannot evaluate if the new professors attracted by the action are worthy of the investment.

　　The chairperson fails to consider if the university has the capability of offering employment to the spouse of every new faculty member.

　　The chairperson fails to illustrate that new gifted professors will not accept our offers if we do not offer such employment.

　　The chairperson overlooks other better ways to achieve the same result.

　　注：题目中括号里的数字表明这句话体现的是提纲中第几号缺陷。

　　无论是gre issue还是gre argument，考生都应该养成写提纲的习惯。这种提纲式的gre写作练习可以帮助考生锻炼写作的逻辑性，而gre写作高分最重要的得分依据就是作文的逻辑性要强。

【gre argument169提纲分析汇总】相关文章：

★ gre argument222提纲分析汇总

★ gre argument231提纲分析汇总

★ gre argument188提纲分析汇总

★ gre argument202提纲分析汇总

★ gre argument233提纲分析汇总

★ gre argument219提纲分析汇总

★ gre argument217提纲分析汇总

★ gre argument190提纲分析汇总

★ gre argument227提纲分析汇总

★ gre argument215提纲分析汇总