The author fails to illustrate that owning a dog would have the same positive effects on recovery of heart disease as it has on preventing heart disease.
Some patients may not be willing to adopt a dog, or capable of owning dogs, or could afford raising a dog.
The patients may suffer form other health problems, thus their medical expenses would not necessarily decrease even if owning a dog could indeed lower the risk of heart disease.
The author unfairly assumes that at least a significant number of people who adopt pets from the shelter will have risks of heart disease.
The author fails to illustrate that adopting other pets would have the same effect on preventing heart disease as owning a dog has.
The author hastily assumes that the proposed program would be appealing to the general public.
Since the risk of heart disease in the general population might be influenced by many factors, implementing the program alone may not sufficiently reduce the risk.
注:题目中括号里的数字表明这句话体现的是提纲中第几号缺陷。
无论是gre issue还是gre argument,考生都应该养成写提纲的习惯。这种提纲式的gre写作练习可以帮助考生锻炼写作的逻辑性,而gre写作高分最重要的得分依据就是作文的逻辑性要强。
【gre argument129提纲分析汇总】相关文章:
最新
2016-03-01
2016-03-01
2016-03-01
2016-03-01
2016-03-01
2016-03-01