The author fails to illustrate that charging people for using the beach could effectively stop the erosion.
The author fails to analyze how much money should we charge to raise enough money for replenishing the sand, and if the charge is feasible.
The author ignores some negative effects of the charging policy.
The author fails to demonstrate if the buildings alone our shores need to be protected.
The fact that replenishing beach sand has served to protect shoreline buildings on nearby Batia does not indicate that Tria would also achieve its goals by following Batias example.
The author unfairly assumes that replenishing sand would suffice to reduce the buildings risk of damage from severe storms.
The assumption that the proposed actions will necessarily make the seashore more attractive is open to doubt.
Adopting the actions proposed by the author might not sufficiently improve Trias tourist in the long term.
注:题目中括号里的数字表明这句话体现的是提纲中第几号缺陷。
无论是gre issue还是gre argument,考生都应该养成写提纲的习惯。这种提纲式的gre写作练习可以帮助考生锻炼写作的逻辑性,而gre写作高分最重要的得分依据就是作文的逻辑性要强。
【gre argument152提纲分析汇总】相关文章:
最新
2016-03-01
2016-03-01
2016-03-01
2016-03-01
2016-03-01
2016-03-01