The author fails to provide information about the capacity of our existing power plant and actual amount of electricity consumption, thus we cannot evaluate if the new power plant will be necessary.
We do not know how much money would be spent for the reimbursement to reduce energy usage to former levels, maybe a new power plant will be more economically efficient if the reimbursement is very expensive.
The author ignores other solution to reduce energy usage.
Granted that the authors proposal is necessary, we cannot ensure that energy consumption will decline to the levels of five years ago.
注:题目中括号里的数字表明这句话体现的是提纲中第几号缺陷。
无论是gre issue还是gre argument,考生都应该养成写提纲的习惯。这种提纲式的gre写作练习可以帮助考生锻炼写作的逻辑性,而gre写作高分最重要的得分依据就是作文的逻辑性要强。
【gre argument122提纲分析汇总】相关文章:
最新
2016-03-01
2016-03-01
2016-03-01
2016-03-01
2016-03-01
2016-03-01