The editorial fails to take into account possible differences between East and West Cambria that are relevant to how drivers react to speed limit changes.
In addition, while it is true that many voters change their minds several times before voting, and that some remain undecided until entering the voting booth, this is not true of everyone.
Without knowing the extent and nature of the damage resulting from the bad publicity or the reason for the violation, we cannot accept the authors conclusion.
The authors proposal is inconsistent with the authors conclusion about the consequences of adopting an ethics code.
To begin with, the author fails to consider health threats posed by incinerating trash.
The authors conclusion that switching to incineration would be more salutary for public health would be seriously undermined.
【GRE考试逻辑问题分析论证句式(一)】相关文章:
最新
2016-03-01
2016-03-01
2016-03-01
2016-03-01
2016-03-01
2016-03-01