In summary, the arguer fails to convince with the argument as presented. To strengthen the argument, the arguer must show a direct link between the breaking apart of neuropeptides and loss of memory and learning ability. Additionally, he or she must show that students poor memory and difficulty in concentrating is a result of the same process, and that the researchers compounds would have as beneficial an effect on humans as it seems to have on rats.
参考译文
随着人们日渐衰老,一种被称为PEP的酶会不断地分解学习与记忆过程中所涉及到的神经肽化学物。但现在,研究人员已发现了可阻止PEP致使神经肽分裂的化合物。在测试中,这些化合物几乎在老鼠身上能完全恢复缺失的记忆。这些化合物的运用应该也推广到记忆力衰弱或专注力有困难的学生身上,不然将会造成学业表现上的严重问题。科学终于解决了那些令家长和老师束手无策的问题。
在本段论述中,论述者指出,研究人员已发现了某些化合物,可以阻止一种被称为PEP的酶的物质将神经肽予以分解,而神经肽则是学习和记忆过程中所需涉及到的物质。论述者还宣称,检测结果表明,这些化合物几乎完全恢复了老鼠身上缺失的记忆。因此这些化合物应该让那些记忆力差和难于集中注意力的学生服用。这段论述缺乏说服力,因为它包含着某些逻辑推理方面甚为严重的缺陷。
【GRE出国考试写作:GRE出国考试作文范例14】相关文章:
★ GRE写作考试范文2:American black bears
最新
2016-03-01
2016-03-01
2016-03-01
2016-03-01
2016-03-01
2016-03-01