GRE作文点评：观点很特别的驳论文_GRE写作

GRE作文点评：观点很特别的驳论文

　　说实话，我觉得这一段里，玩了一个诡辩的小伎俩：先是指出原文观点的自相矛盾性，然后引出自己的看法认识论远重要于获取新的事实和信息，也就是要先认识知识和理解力的局限然后才是摄取新知。

　　How can we reconcile our experience in everyday endeavors with the basic assumption underlying the scientific method? Perhaps the answer lies in a distinction between two types of knowledgeone which amounts to a mere collection of observations , the other which is deeper and includes a realization of principles and truths underlying those observations. At this deeper level knowledge equals under- standing: how we interpret, make sense of, and find meaning in the information we collect by way of observation.

　　就上一段提出的问题推出自己的解决方法，即认识到知识分成两种：纯观察行为所得的信息；萃取之后的经过自己消化后的理解。但我觉得这里还有待发挥，估计是时间不够了，仓促间收笔吧。没有很好的说明白。

　　In the final analysis, evaluating the speakers assertion requires that we define knowledge,which in turn requires that we address complex epistemological issues best left to philosophers and theologians. Yet perhaps this is the speakers point: that we can never truly know either ourselves or the world, and that by recognizing this limitation we set ourselves free to accomplish what no amount of mere information could ever permit.