When it comes to another point of the speakers argument, namely the goal of politics should not be the pursuit of an ideal; my attitude sharply varies between different explanations and comprehensions on the key word- ideal. If ideal was defined as impractical ideas- castle in the air, of course, it should not be the base for the policy-making. The leader with hollow ideal may lead his people to abyss, such as the former Iraq president s dream of his Arab empire. However, if the ideal was defined as certain ground and reasonable ambition, it could even be argued that the very difference between politician and statesman comes from the pursuit of ideal. Politicians do with the ideal, statesman without. The most brilliant politicians in the history are those who are harboring holy but ground ideals, cherish their ideals as the source of commitment.

　　In a sum, politics has its specific trait, once an individual steps on the power stage; he will greatly influence the rest of people, and his decision impacting the interests of various groups are unavoidable to be the result of compromise, a wiser politician will pursuit their reasonable ideals and move ahead on the process of compromise.

【gre issue写作优秀实例：政治的统一与分歧】相关文章：

★ 2011gre issue写作优秀实例：审查的公正性

★ gre issue写作优秀实例：法律

★ 2011gre issue写作优秀实例：传统与现实

★ gre issue写作优秀实例：新手与专家

★ 2011gre issue写作优秀实例：政治的统一与分歧

★ 2011gre issue写作优秀实例：政治和生活

★ 2011gre issue写作优秀实例：客观与主观

★ gre issue写作优秀实例：研究经费

★ GRE Issue写作优秀实例：政治的统一与分歧

★ 2011gre issue写作优秀实例：必修课和选修课