surface of Earth. Therefore, the water in Earths oceans must have originatedfrom comets.
In my opinion, I tend to makethis pink part as the whole background of the Earth being. Rests of it is thereal reasoning of this author stated his own minds. So you just to be believedto this process and leave the REALISITY alone. Based on this evidence theauthor given to turn your argument out.
Setp three: Analyzingthe reasoning.
Untill now, whatever youhad be surprising or raptured, the fact is apparent standing in here, which isa simple structure he done. You can see clearly the err and the how caused tothem.
Firstly, this is aseries of unfairly causalities. And that is also the major vice the author appeared.I will detail it from three aspects.
With the constructionof comets,the author did not provideany evidence to demonstrate the frozen water and gases are the major substancesmade up in it. For the metter, vapor may be the one consequence of allpossibilites of comets cracked to the Earth.
Therefore, how the waterhad being generated and droped down the earth is a unconvincing assumption.
With the parttern ofraindrop,even though weaccknowledged the foregoing point is alright, the author still were short ofthe evidence and nesassary intruduction of other partterns the water formed inour Earth.
And it also could bedoubted because the author didshow us the definite information of this raindrop. What the amounts of thewater came from raining was? Are there other space rocks have such kindssubstances which can produce the water? Lacking these information, the authorcan not point out his final study.
【GRE argument写作难题破解示例】相关文章:
最新
2016-03-01
2016-03-01
2016-03-01
2016-03-01
2016-03-01
2016-03-01