Finally, this argument does not account for the possibility that the survey samples themselves were flawed. There is no indication given about how many people were surveyed, the demographics involved, or the specific locations involved. For example, richer people would tend not to visit public libraries but they are possibly more predisposed to reading literary classics. Similarly, people who visit public libraries may be more predisposed to reading mystery novels than literary classics. Without knowing the relationship between those first surveyed and those who visit the public libraries, it is not possible to draw a proper conclusion about the accuracy of the first group s statements.

　　In summary, the arguer fails to convince by jumping to a conclusion that fails to hold up to analysis. To strengthen the argument, the arguer needs to find further research that eliminates these other possibilities that preclude the judgment that the first group of respondents misrepresented their reading habits.

【GRE考试Issue写作范文详解(17)】相关文章：

★ GRE官方Issue范文(一)

★ GRE Issue写作范文详细解析(5)

★ [GRE写作]GRE考生issue写作常见问题

★ GRE写作范文：权威问题

★ GRE考生issue写作常见问题

★ 最新GRE考试写作部分实用句型总结

★ GRE Issue写作范文详细解析(6)

★ 如何突破GRE issue写作

★ 新GRE考试辅导写作部分讲解

★ Issue写作常见问题及解决方法