This assumption overlooks other criteria for determining a bridge s importance such as the number of commuters using the bridge, the role of the bridge in local emergencies and disasters, and the impact that bridge closure would have on the economies of nearby cities.
Without such evidence, we cannot accept the author s conclusion that no government funds should be directed toward maintaining the Styx River bridge.
The fact that the nearby city has a weakening economy does not prove that the city will not contribute significantly to tax revenues.
Substantiating this assumption requires examining the proper duty of government.
Accordingly, this assumption is simply an unproven claim.
The author is presenting a false dilemma by imposing an either or choice between two courses of action that need not be mutually exclusive.
It is equally possible that legislators can address both areas of concern concurrently.
The argument relies on the assumption that the legislators in questionhave the opportunity to address urban crime problems.
Finally, the author unfairly trivializes the severity of rural crime by simply comparing it with urban crime.
It is possible that the sales trend in a particular location is not representative of sales in other regions.
However, the author fails to acknowledge and rule out other possible causes of such accidents.
【GRE考试逻辑问题分析论证句式(二)】相关文章:
最新
2016-03-01
2016-03-01
2016-03-01
2016-03-01
2016-03-01
2016-03-01