To add to the lack of credibility, the study does not discuss the relative size of the garbage sites or how close the homes and people were to the sites. There is really no data present to allow a proper decision to be made restricting the size of the sites or how close the homes could be located near the trash sites. At the very least, the fact that there is a slightly higher incidence of rashes in those living nearest the biggest trash sites indicates a need for further studies to prove or disprove the idea that trash sites of a certain size or location are health hazards.

　　In summary, the findings and conclusions of the Trash-Site Safety Council are based mainly on speculation and a small amount of indicative data. The disclosure of the council members motives, the study of a larger sample of the population and trash sites, and further information on other types of health problems and relative nearness of the homes and people to the trash sites would give a much better argument either for or against restrictions on the such sites.

【GRE考试Issue写作范文详解(13)】相关文章：

★ 新GRE考试辅导写作部分讲解

★ GRE 写作考试范文4:Statistics

★ GRE Issue主题范文及评析3

★ 官方GRE argument 范文解析

★ GRE写作范文：权威问题

★ gre考试写作逻辑结构是关键

★ GRE Issue作文范文

★ 精美GRE写作范文

★ Issue写作常见问题及解决方法

★ GRE写作：Issue主题范文及评析1