19. If so,even though 3 percent more accidents occurred after the change,the author s argument that changing the speed limit increases danger for drivers would be seriously weakened.21. In addition,while it is true that many voters change their minds several times before voting,and that some remain undecided until entering the voting booth,this is not true of everyone.
22. Without knowing the extent and nature of the damage resulting from the bad publicity or the reason for the violation,we cannot accept the author s conclusion.
23. The author s proposal is inconsistent with the author s conclusion about the consequences of adopting an ethics code.
24. To begin with,the author fails to consider health threats posed by incinerating trash.
25. The author s conclusion that switching to incineration would be more salutary for public health would be seriously undermined.
26. However,this is not necessarily the case.
27. The author s implicit claim that incinerators are economically advantageous to landfills is poorly supported.
28. Consequently,unless the author can demonstrate that the city will incur expenses that are not covered by the increased revenues from these projects,the author s concern about these issues is unfounded.
29. First of all,while asserting that real incomes are rising,the author provides no evidence to support this assertion.31. Moreover,the author fails to consider and rule out other factors that might account for proportional decreases in spending on food.
【GRE考试作文经典背诵句式(二)】相关文章:
最新
2016-03-01
2016-03-01
2016-03-01
2016-03-01
2016-03-01
2016-03-01