Secondly, the argument assumes that the government regulations will properly reflect scientific recommendations. However, this claim is somewhat dubious. Companies with the most money and political influence, not the scientists, might in some cases dictate regulatory standards. In other words, legislators may be more influenced by political expediency and campaign pork than by societal concerns.

　　Thirdly, waiting until government regulations are in place can have disastrous effects on the environment. A great deal of environmental damage can occur before regulations are implemented. This problem is compounded whenever government reaction to scientific evidence is slow. Moreover, the EPA might be overburdened with its detection and enforcement duties, thereby allowing continued environmental damage by companies who have not yet been caught or who appeal penalties.

　　In conclusion, despite uncertainty within the scientific community about what environmental standards are best, companies should not wait for government regulation before reacting to warnings about environmental problems. The speakers recommended approach would in many cases operate inequitably among companies: moreover, it ignores the political-corruption factor as well as the potential environmental damage resulting from bureaucratic delay.

　　小编提醒：考生们可在日常生活中多读范文，多练笔，培养出好的语感和逻辑，这样才能在考试中写出优秀的作文。

【备考资料：GMAT优秀作文精选（151）】相关文章：

★ 备考资料：GMAT优秀作文精选（93）

★ 备考资料：GMAT优秀作文精选（92）

★ 备考资料：GMAT优秀作文精选（123）

★ 备考资料：GMAT优秀作文精选（32）

★ 备考资料：GMAT优秀作文精选（2）

★ 备考资料：GMAT优秀作文精选（29）

★ 备考资料：GMAT优秀作文精选（117）

★ 备考资料：GMAT优秀作文精选（70）

★ 备考资料：GMAT优秀作文精选（55）

★ 备考资料：GMAT优秀作文精选（7）