Moreover, both of these assumptions can be challenged. It is possible that stronger protections would not greatly affect industry investment or jobs overall, but would instead help to determine which companies invested heavily and, therefore, provided the jobs. For instance, a less-restricted market might foster investment and competition among smaller companies, whereas stronger legal protections might encourage market domination by fewer, larger companies.

　　In conclusion, I do not find this argument compelling. The author must provide evidence that home security system designs are not being adequately, protected by current patent, copyright or trade secret laws. The author must also provide an argument for the assumptions that stronger laws will create more industry jobs overall, while the absence of stronger laws will result in fewer industry jobs.

　　小编提醒：考生们可在日常生活中多读范文，多练笔，培养出好的语感和逻辑，这样才能在考试中写出优秀的作文。

【备考资料：GMAT优秀作文精选（205）】相关文章：

★ 备考资料：GMAT优秀作文精选（64）

★ 备考资料：GMAT优秀作文精选（177）

★ 备考资料：GMAT优秀作文精选（61）

★ 备考资料：GMAT优秀作文精选（48）

★ 备考资料：GMAT优秀作文精选（101）

★ 备考资料：GMAT优秀作文精选（179）

★ 备考资料：GMAT优秀作文精选（36）

★ 备考资料：GMAT优秀作文精选（138）

★ 备考资料：GMAT优秀作文精选（209）

★ 备考资料：GMAT优秀作文精选（100）