Finally, the argument relies on the assumption that synthesizing copper will not create the same kind of pollution problems as those resulting from the synthesis of copper substitutes. However, the author provides no evidence to substantiate this assumption. Without such evidence, we cannot accept the premise that pollution problems will be eliminated by switching from producing copper substitutes to producing copper itself.in conclusion, I am not convinced on the basis of this argument that the time has come to cut funding for the regulation of mining in general, or even for the regulation of copper mining in particular. To strengthen the argument, the author must restrict the scope of the conclusion to copper mining rather than to mining in general. The author must also provide support for the two assumptions underlying the argument.

　　小编提醒：考生们可在日常生活中多读范文，多练笔，培养出好的语感和逻辑，这样才能在考试中写出优秀的作文。

【备考资料：GMAT优秀作文精选（223）】相关文章：

★ 备考资料：GMAT优秀作文精选（104）

★ 备考资料：GMAT优秀作文精选（80）

★ 备考资料：GMAT优秀作文精选（151）

★ 备考资料：GMAT优秀作文精选（87）

★ 备考资料：GMAT优秀作文精选（184）

★ 备考资料：GMAT优秀作文精选（57）

★ 备考资料：GMAT优秀作文精选（127）

★ 备考资料：GMAT优秀作文精选（58）

★ 备考资料：GMAT优秀作文精选（61）

★ 备考资料：GMAT优秀作文精选（43）