Finally, the fact that Glabrous competitors use more HR2 in their products than
Glabrous uses is irrelevant to the question of whether Glabrous should remove HR2
from its product. Moreover, rather than providing a reason for not removing the
compound, this fact serves better as a reason for doing so. By removing HR2 from its
product Glabrous could gain an edge over its competitors.
In conclusion, the reasoning in this argument is not convincing. To strengthen the
argument the author would have to show that the study was biased or was based on too
small a sample to yield reliable results.
【GMAT考试写作指导:Argument范文十】相关文章:
最新
2016-03-02
2016-03-02
2016-03-02
2016-03-02
2016-03-02
2016-03-02