1, The author commits a fallcy of false analogy.
2, Therefore the proposal of investment in the Irongate district is groundless. No investment should be made until other factors have been considered and the benefit-cost analysis has been made.
3, The programme suggested by the author is reckless or even ridiculous. The possible result can be the opposite of the authors imagination because the consumers have interest of only one or two of the three stores.
1, The business increases occured in the past two years. No one can guarantee the future profit.
2, The three new companies are not necessarily analogous to those profitable ones.
3, The condition that is required is absurd. There is no causal relatioship between the condition and the collective profit.
A1. The following editorial appeared in the South Fork Gazette.
Last year, the city contracted with Flower Power to plant a variety of flowers in big decorative pots on Main Street and to water them each week. By midsummer many of the plants were wilted. This year the city should either contract for two waterings a week or save money by planting artificial flowers in the pots. According to Flower Power, the initial cost for artificial flowers would be twice as much as for real plants, but after two years, we would save money. Public reaction certainly supports this position: in a recent survey, over 1,200 Gazette readers said that the city wastes money and should find ways to reduce spending.
【GMAT新黄金80题及范文(十八)】相关文章:
最新
2016-03-02
2016-03-02
2016-03-02
2016-03-02
2016-03-02
2016-03-02