wisdom of Cumquats decision to relocate.
Thirdly, the claim that RoboWrench is doing better is unwarranted by the
evidence. The mere fact that RoboWrench plans to open a new store in a nearby city
does not by itself establish that business is good. It is possible that the purpose of this
plan is to compensate for lackluster business at the current location. Or perhaps the
RoboWrench owners are simply exercising poor business judgment.
Finally, the claim that Cumquat made a mistake in moving may be too hasty, since
the conclusion is based on only one years business at the new location. Moreover,
given the time it ordinarily takes for a business to develop a new customer base in a new
location, the fact that Cumquats volume of business is about the same as before it
moved tends to show that the move was a good decision, not a mistake.
In conclusion, the claim that Cumquats move was a mistake is ill-founded, since
it is based on both poor and incomplete comparisons as welt as on a premature
conclusion. To better assess the argument, we need to know what the author is
comparing RoboWrenchs performance to; we also need more information about the
extent of RoboWrenchs success at this location and why its owners are opening a new
【GMAT考试写作指导:Argument范文五】相关文章:
最新
2016-03-02
2016-03-02
2016-03-02
2016-03-02
2016-03-02
2016-03-02