employees―that is, those who would be least valuable to Beta.
Thirdly, the author assumes that Alpha and Beta are sufficiently similar so that
former Alpha employees could provide special value for Beta. However, we are
informed only that Beta manufactures some products similar to Alphas. It is possible
that former Alpha employees have experience with only a small segment of Betas
product line, and thus have little inside information of any value to Beta.
Finally, the claim that former Alpha employees would be motivated to compete
against Alpha is partially unwarranted. While many of those who were laid off may be
so motivated, those who retired early from Alpha probably departed on good terms with
Alpha, and would in any event be unmotivated to reenter the work force.
In conclusion, the argument fails to provide key facts needed to assess it. To better
evaluate the directors suggestion, we would need more information about why Alpha
reduced its work force, what type of workers left Alpha and under what circumstances,
and how similar Alphas range of products is to Betas.
【GMAT考试写作指导:Argument范文三】相关文章:
最新
2016-03-02
2016-03-02
2016-03-02
2016-03-02
2016-03-02
2016-03-02