66. In determining whether manufacturers should be accountable for all injuries
resulting from the use of their products, one must weigh the interests of consumers
against those of manufacturers. On balance, holding manufacturers strictly liable for
such injuries is unjustifiable.
Admittedly, protecting consumers from defective and dangerous products is an
important and worthwhile goal. No doubt nearly all of us would agree that health and
safety should rank highly as an objective of public policy. Also, compelling a high level
of safety forces manufacturers to become more innovative in design, use of materials,
and so forth. Consumers and manufacturers alike benefit, of course, from innovation.
However, the arguments against a strict-liability standard are more compelling.
First, the standard is costly. It forces-manufacturers to incur undue expenses for
overbuilding, excessive safety testing, and defending liability law suits. Consumers are
then damaged by ultimately bearing these costs in the form of higher prices. Second, the
standard can be unfair. It can assign fault to the wrong party; where a product is
distributed through a wholesaler and/or retailer, one of these parties may have actually
【GMAT考试写作指导:Issue写作范文六六】相关文章:
最新
2016-03-02
2016-03-02
2016-03-02
2016-03-02
2016-03-02
2016-03-02