unwarranted, however. For example, increased leisure time may just as likely result in
more people spending more time cooking gourmet meals in their own homes. Also,
single people may actually be more likely than married people to eat at home than to go
out for meals. Finally, people may choose to spend their additional income in other
ways―on expensive cars, travel, or larger homes.
A third poor assumption is that, even assuming people in Spiessa will choose to
spend more time and money eating out, no extrinsic factors will stifle this demand. This
assumption is unwarranted. Any number of extrinsic factors―such as a downturn in the
general economy or significant layoffs at Spiessas largest businesses―may stall the
current restaurant surge. Moreover, the argument fails to specify the social changes
that have led to the current economic boom. If it turns out these changes are politically
driven, then the surge may very well reverse if political power changes hands.
In conclusion, this argument unfairly assumes a predictable future course for both
supply and demand. To strengthen the argument, the author must at the very least show
that demand for new restaurants has not yet been exhausted, that Spiessa can
【GMAT考试写作指导:Argument范文七一】相关文章:
最新
2016-03-02
2016-03-02
2016-03-02
2016-03-02
2016-03-02
2016-03-02