time, many jobs may have been lost. Finally, the poll indicates that six new corporations
located in the state, but fails to indicate if any left.
Next, the poll cited by the author is described in the vaguest possible terms. The
ad does not indicate who conducted the poll, who responded, or how the poll was
conducted. Until these questions are answered, the survey results are worthless as
evidence for public opinion about Adams or his economic policies.
Finally, while we have only vague and possibly distorted evidence that the state is
better off with Adams, we have absolutely no evidence that it would be worse off with
Zebulon. Given that the state economy is good at the moment, none of the authors
reasons establishes that Adams is the cause of this. And neither do they establish that
the state wouldnt be even better off with someone else in office.
In conclusion, this argument is weak. To strengthen the argument, the author must
provide additional information about the adequacy of state workers pay raises, the
effect of the 5,000 jobs on the states employment picture, the overall growth of
corporations in the state, and other features of the state economy. Also, the author must
【GMAT考试写作指导:Argument范文七五】相关文章:
最新
2016-03-02
2016-03-02
2016-03-02
2016-03-02
2016-03-02
2016-03-02