Finally, while we have only vague and possibly distorted evidence that the state is better off with Adams, we have absolutely no evidence that it would be worse off with Zebulon. Given that the state economy is good at the moment, none of the authors reasons establishes that Adams is the cause of this. And neither do they establish that the state wouldnt be even better off with someone else in office.

　　In conclusion, this argument is weak. To strengthen the argument, the author must provide additional information about the adequacy of state workers pay raises, the effect of the 5,000 jobs on the states employment picture, the overall growth of corporations in the state, and other features of the state economy. Also, the author must support the claims that Adams actions have caused any economic improvement and that in the future Adams will impart more economic benefit than would Zebulon.

　　16.

　　Demographic trends that indicate an increase in the number of college-aged people over the next ten years lead the author to predict an improved job market for all people seeking college-level teaching positions in their academic disciplines. Moreover, the author argues that since Waymarsh University students with advanced degrees had an especially difficult time finding teaching jobs in the past, these trends portend better times ahead for Waymarsh graduates. This argument is problematic in three important respects.

【GMAT考试：Argument写作范文八】相关文章：

★ GMAT考试写作指导：Argument范文八十

★ GMAT考试写作指导：Argument范文八五

★ GMAT考试写作指导：Argument范文二八

★ GMAT Argument写作范文(1)

★ GMAT写作范文精选：Argument例文(15)

★ GMAT写作范文模板：统一和分歧(5)

★ GMAT考试：Argument写作范文十八

★ GMAT考试写作指导：Argument范文四八

★ GMAT考试写作指导：Argument范文八

★ GMAT写作范文精选：Argument例文(33)