GMAT考试写作指导：Argument范文十九_GMAT写作

　　79. This newspaper editorial concludes that our city should build a plant for burning

　　trash in order to avoid the serious health threats associated with many landfills. The

　　author adds that an incinerator could offer economic benefits as well, since incinerators

　　can be adapted to generate small amounts of electricity for other uses, and since ash

　　residue from some kinds of trash can be used as a soil conditioner. Even if these claims

　　are true, the authors argument is unconvincing in three important respects.

　　To begin with, the author fails to consider health threats posed by incinerating

　　trash. It is possible, for example, that respiratory problems resulting from the air

　　pollution caused by burning trash might be so extensive that they would outweigh the

　　health risks associated with landfills. If so, the authors conclusion that switching to

　　incineration would be more salutary for public health would be seriously undermined.

　　Secondly, the author assumes that discontinuing landfill operations would abate

　　the heath threats they now pose. However, this is not necessarily the case. It is possible

　　that irreversible environmental damage to subterranean water supplies, for example, has

　　already occurred. In this event, changing from landfills to incinerators might not avoid

【GMAT考试写作指导：Argument范文十九】相关文章：

12 显示全文

上一篇：GMAT考试：Argument写作范文十二下一篇：GMAT考试：Argument写作范文八

GMAT写作 最新: GMAT作文黄金题
2016-03-02; 如何写出结构清晰的GMAT作文
2016-03-02; GMAT写作模板句型
2016-03-02; GMAT作文之高分速成
2016-03-02; GMAT作文机经
2016-03-02; GMAT写作之经典范文
2016-03-02

网友关注: The city of the future 城市的未来; 西班牙罗宾汉餐厅'劫富济贫'; Mansplaining 男人说教; 《美国队长3：内战》电影精讲; 想获得女生青睐？那就多吃瓜果蔬菜！; 伊万卡·特朗普在特朗普国际酒店开业典礼上的演讲; Rust belt?; Exit poll?; 大熊猫“国家公园体制”试点方案通过; 英国菲利普亲王退休女王丈夫毒舌语录盘点