GMAT Argument经典范文赏析（1）_GMAT写作

GMAT Argument经典范文赏析（1）

　　In sum, the argument is not compelling because it omitted many other factors that must be addressed in order to make proper conclusion. If the author has considered the difference between color film and food industry, selling price, and product quality, the argument would be more convincing

　　GMAT作文范文2：Argument

　　2. The following appeared in a memorandum from the business department of the Apogee Company. When the Apogee Company had all its operations in one location, it was more profitable than it is today. Therefore, the Apogee Company should close down its field offices and conduct all its operations from a single location. Such centralization would improve profitability by cutting costs and helping the company maintain better supervision of all employees。 Discuss how well reasoned . . . Etc。

　　The author argues that Apogee Company improves profitability by closing down its field offices and conducting all its operations from a single location. To support this argument, the author states that such centralization would improve profitability by cutting costs and helping the company maintain better supervision of all employees. In addition, the author points out that Apogee Company enjoyed a more profitable business in the past when it had all its operations in one location. However, the authors argument is flawed in three aspects。

　　In the first place, the author regards a complicated managerial issue as a single-step change in operations and ignores many relevant factors. A companys profitability is determined by a whole bunch of economic, social, political, and cultural factors as well as management skills and employees attitude. Luck also plays an important role. It can be reasonably assumed that Apogee Company is suffering a low profitability at present. The reasons can be many, so any single adjustment without considering other possible influential factors is incomplete, and any oversimplified conclusion is unfounded。