26. The following appeared in a memorandum from a member of a financial management
and consulting firm.
We have learned from an employee of Windfall, Ltd., that its accounting
department, by checking about ten percent of the last months purchasing invoices for
errors and inconsistencies, saved the company some $10,000 in overpayments. In order
to help our clients increase their net gains, we should advice each of them to institute a
policy of checking all purchasing invoices for errors. Such a recommendation could
also help us get the Windfall account by demonstrating to Windfall the rigorousness of
our methods.
Sample Essay 1:
The argument that checking all purchasing invoices for errors will not only
increase the net gains of the clients but also help the firm get the Windfall account is not
entirely logically convincing, since it ignores certain crucial assumptions.
First, the argument assumes that instituting a policy of checking all purchasing
invoices can help find out the errors and inconsistencies. There are a number of reasons
why this might not be true. For example, the people who check the accounts will
probably make mistakes as anyone else, intentionally or unconsciously. If they do,
【GMAT考试写作指导:Argument范文四四】相关文章:
最新
2016-03-02
2016-03-02
2016-03-02
2016-03-02
2016-03-02
2016-03-02