Sample Essay 2:
In this argument a member of a financial management and consulting firm reasons
that since Windfall Ltd. increased its net gains by checking 10 percent of its purchasing
invoices for errors, it would be a good idea to advise the firms clients to institute a
policy of checking all purchasing invoices for errors. Two potential benefits are
foreseen from this recommendation: it could help the firms clients increase their net
gains, and it could help the firm land the Windfall account. The members argument is
unconvincing for a couple of reasons.
The main problem with the argument is that the conclusion is based upon
insufficient evidence. The fact that some of Windfalls purchasing invoices contained
errors might simply be attributable to the sloppy accounting practices of Windfalls
suppliers. Thus, rather than indicating a general problem, the invoice errors might
simply be indicative of a problem that is specific to Windfall Ltd. In other words, the
evidence drawn from Windfalls experience is insufficient to support the conclusion that
all purchasing invoices are subject to similar errors.
Secondly, the evidence offered in the argument suggests only that companies
【GMAT考试写作指导:Argument范文四四】相关文章:
最新
2016-03-02
2016-03-02
2016-03-02
2016-03-02
2016-03-02
2016-03-02