Finally, the author unfairly trivializes the severity of rural crime by simply comparing it with urban crime. While trespassing, vandalism, and fruit-stealing may seem minor peccadilloes, especially compared to violent urban crimes, these rural crimes might nevertheless result in serious financial damage to farm owners, depending on the frequency and extent of the violations. The author fails to provide evidence for the claim that these rural crimes are trivial. Instead, the author attempts to call attention to a more dramatic but potentially irrelevant problem.

　　In conclusion, the argument is weak. It potentially distorts the alternatives available to legislators in the region, as well as deflecting attention from the problem at hand. To better evaluate it, we would need more information about the geographical scope of this legislatures jurisdiction and about the extent of the fruit-stealing problem in the region.

【GMAT考试：Argument写作范文三十五】相关文章：

★ GMAT作文：Argument范文精选（42）

★ GMAT写作练习：Argument（1）

★ 新GMAT考试中的Argument变化有哪些

★ GMAT考试issue范文提纲（37）

★ GMAT考试issue范文提纲（23）

★ GMAT写作范文精选：Argument例文(36)

★ 2011年12月GMAT考试作文AA内容回忆

★ 精选GMAT写作范文50篇（6）

★ GMAT作文：Argument范文精选（11）

★ GMAT考试issue范文提纲（1）