graduation to college has increased because Einstein is doing a better job of educating

　　its students. However, the fact that more Einstein graduates now go on to college might

　　simply reflect a general trend. And the general trend might have less to do with

　　improved secondary education than with the reality that a college degree is now the

　　standard of entry into most desirable jobs.

　　But even if the quality of education at Einstein had improved, would this be a

　　compelling reason to deny Einstein additional funding? I dont think so. It is possible

　　that the school has managed to deliver better education in spite of meager funding.

　　Teachers may be dipping into their own pockets for supplies and other resources

　　necessary for doing their job well. Perhaps the quality of education at Einstein would

　　improve even more with additional financial support.

　　In sum, this argument does not establish the conclusion that additional funding for

　　Einstein is unnecessary. To do so, the speaker would have to provide evidence that the

　　quality of education at Einstein has improved. This could be done by examining student

　　assessment scores or by tracking students through their college careers to see how many

【GMAT考试写作指导：Argument范文四七】相关文章：

★ GMAT Argument写作范文89篇（13）

★ GMAT Argument写作范文89篇（11）

★ GMAT写作范文精选：Argument例文(14)

★ GMAT写作范文精选：Argument例文(35)

★ 精选GMAT写作范文50篇（35）

★ GMAT写作范文精选：Argument例文(9)

★ GMAT作文：Argument范文精选（36）

★ GMAT作文：Argument范文精选（26）

★ GMAT写作范文精选：Argument例文(39)

★ GMAT写作必备句型汇总5（带译文）