下面GMAT为大家整理了细数GMAT Argument的8宗罪,供考生们参考,以下是详细内容。
第一宗罪:无因果联系
The author commits a fallacy of over simplification.
The line of reasoning is that because A occurred before B/that because A coincided with B, the former is totally responsible for the latter.
But this is fallacious reasoning unless other possible causal explanations have been considered and ruled out.
For example, perhaps B is caused by C, or perhaps D is the cause of B.
If so, then the author cannot justify
第二宗罪 Insufficient-sample
The argument assumes that A is representative of as a group.
However, it supplies no evidence to support this assumption.
It is possible that
In fact, in face of such limited evidence, the authors conclusion is completely unwarranted.
第三宗罪: 错误类比 横向
It is highly doubtful that the facts drawn from are applicable to
Although there are points of comparison between and , there remain many dissimilarities as well.
For example, A , however B
Thus, it is likely more difficult for B to
第四宗罪 all things are equal纵向
【细数GMAT Argument的8宗罪】相关文章:
最新
2016-03-02
2016-03-02
2016-03-02
2016-03-02
2016-03-02
2016-03-02