The argument suffers from a fallacy of all things are equal in assuming that will remain/have remained unchanged in future/since
However, it fails to consider that might, for whatever reason.
Since the argument does not account for possibility such as this, it is unconvincing thatwould
第五宗罪 Either-Or choice
The author assumes that A and B are mutually exclusive alternatives and there is no room for a middle ground.
However, the author provides no reason for imposing an either-or choice.
Common sense tells us that adjusting both A and B could produce a better result.
第六宗罪 survey is doubtful
The poll cited by the author is too vague to be informative.
The claim does not indicate who conducted the poll or when, where and how the poll was conducted.
For example, if 200 persons were surveyed but only 2 responded/if only 10 persons were surveyed and , the conclusion drawn from the survey would be highly suspect.
Until these questions are answered, the results of the survey are worthless as evidence for the conclusion.
第七宗罪 gratuitous assumption
The author depends on gratuitous assumption that
However, no evidence is stated in the argument to support this assumption.
【细数GMAT Argument的8宗罪】相关文章:
最新
2016-03-02
2016-03-02
2016-03-02
2016-03-02
2016-03-02
2016-03-02