范文:
The author assumes that since organizations engaged in color-film processing were able to increase efficiency and cut-down costs over a period of 25 years; same must be true of Olympic Foods, which is about to celebrate its 25th anniversary. The arguments is based on questionable assumptions and weak analogies and appears to be a result of a hasty generalization.
The main problem with the authors reasoning is the weak analogy he develops between the two processing industries. One fails to see any logical connection between the two and the author makes no effort to show the connection either. The two industries are too dissimilar to be compared. For example: frozen food industry faces problem of storage, transportation, contamination etc; no similar problems are observed in the film-processing industry. Even the markets for the two differ widely. The argument could have been strong if the author could show the missing connection or if he had compared the frozen-food industry with a similar industry.
以上就是小编整理的GMAT考试作文部分需要关注的细节知识,GMAT作文佳作不是那么容易就能练就的。以上的GMAT写作逻辑漏洞大家要注意了,不能让这些考试细节影响到我们的作文写作。
【GMAT写作逻辑通常有哪些漏洞】相关文章:
最新
2016-03-02
2016-03-02
2016-03-02
2016-03-02
2016-03-02
2016-03-02