Circular Reasoning
Circular reasoning involves assuming as a premise that which you are trying to prove. Intuitively, it may seem that no one would fall for such an argument. However, the conclusion may appear to state something additional, or the argument may be so long that the reader may forget that the conclusion was
Example:
The death penalty is appropriate for traitors because it is right to execute
those who betray their own country and thereby risk the lives of millions.
This argument is circular because right means essentially the same thing as appropriate. In effect, the writer is saying that the death penalty is a ppropriate because it is appropriate.
Shifting The Burden Of Proof
It is incumbent on the writer to provide evidence or support for her position. To imply that a position is true merely because no one has disproved it is to shift the burden of proof to others.
Example:
Since no one has been able to prove Gods existence, there must not be a God
There are two major weaknesses in this argument. First, the fact that Gods existence has yet to be proven does not preclude any future proof of existence. Second, if there is a God, one would expect that his existence is independent of any proof by man.
【GMAT考试:Testprep数学精解2】相关文章:
最新
2016-03-02
2016-03-02
2016-03-02
2016-03-02
2016-03-02
2016-03-02