让我们进入第二篇阅读,不用说,肯定也涉及到抄袭现象这个问题了。文章第一句告送我们:Words belong to the person who wrote them. 这句话是什么意思大家都清楚,刚读完第一篇文章就看到这句话,我们有一个很深刻的印象,那就是第二篇文章肯定是坚决反对抄袭现象的了。而文章后面的内容都是支持第一句话的:There are few simpler ethical notions than this, particularly as society directs more and more energy toward the creation of intellectual property. In the past 30 years, copyright laws have been strengthened, fighting piracy has become an obsession with Hollywood, and in the worlds of academia and publishing, plagiarism has gone from being bad literary manners to something close to a felony. 同样是讲反对抄袭现象,但是我们可以发现与第一篇阅读更多体现出的无奈不同,第二篇阅读态度更加坚决,尤其是后面提到了copyright laws把这一问题从道德级别上升到了法律级别,强调抄袭几乎等同于犯罪。文章最后同样选择了打比方,When a noted historian was recently fond to have lifted passages from other historians she was asked to resign form the board of the Pulitzer Prize committee. And why not? If she had robbed a bank, she would have been fired the next day. 一个历史学家因为抄袭受到了重罚。为什么不重罚她呢?抢别人的成果这种不劳而获的危险行为无异于抢银行,你抢了银行,当然要开除你。
【SAT阅读SPP策略(二)】相关文章:
最新
2016-03-02
2016-03-02
2016-03-02
2016-03-02
2016-03-02
2016-03-02