At first he seems to agree with Gandhi, but then he back pedals a bit. Then he seems to agree with Orwell, but goes on to qualify. This might be construed as a weakness in his response, but Marco saves himself by drawing his own very valid conclusionwisdom in choosing friends is what is most important.
Based on the Scoring Guide, Marcos response is a solid four. He responds adequately and has mastery in his writing. Some might even argue for a five for Marco. It is true that he demonstrates reasonable mastery. His writing is good. His waffling on the issue, usually a weakness in a response, can be construed as his strong point in this case.
This waffling about his score is important for you to understand as well. There is no one perfect four response, nor is there a perfect six response. Within each number, falls a great range of responses. Likewise, what one reader sees as a four, another might see as a five. That is okay. In a holistic scoring evaluation, such how the SAT essays are scored, readers can be one point different from each other, and it happens. If they are two points apart, however, a third reader is brought in to evaluate the situation. Just remember that your score is the total of both scores. Marcos paper, therefore, would very probably earn him a 9 for that part of the exam.
以上就是这篇SAT写作高分范文的详细内容,包括了对SAT写作题目的介绍和后面的范文点评三个部分的内容,非常详细。大家在备考自己的SAT写作考试的时候,可以适当的参考一下这类话题的范文。
【SAT写作高分范文之sins】相关文章:
★ SAT写作高分范文之wrongdoing and sins
最新
2016-06-14
2016-06-14
2016-03-02
2016-03-02
2016-03-02
2016-03-02