Professor Henry Farrell of George Washington University says the report could damage the CIAs public image around the world.
But I think, at the very least, were going to see some embarrassment for the United States, when some of the stuff that the CIA was, in fact, doing in the first years after September 11th are revealed publicly, and thats going to, I think, be quite controversial in other countries.
But Professor Farrell says world leaders are not likely to be concerned about the dispute between the Senate and the CIA. Mark Lowenthal agrees. He is president of the Intelligence and Security Academy. He says all countries that work with the United States know there is a system of congressional oversight.
All the countries with whom we work know that we have a congressional oversight system, and that certain materials are given to the House and Senate as part of their oversight. So the fact that this is going on is probably not going to be news to anybody, and so I dont think it will affect those relationships.
He also says the dispute may show the value of the American system of government.
This is how you run a secret intelligence community in a democracy, that there are rules, and theres a give-and-take, and that the intelligence community is not just doing things on their own.
is an election year in the United States. The Republican Party could claim a majority in the Senate in November. A Republican Senator would lead the Intelligence Committee if that happens. And Republicans have not shown that they want the report on CIA interrogation methods made public. Im Mario Ritter.
【2014英语四级听力练习慢速3.20(1)】相关文章:
最新
2017-01-16
2016-10-21
2016-10-08
2016-10-08
2016-10-08
2016-10-08