The two women in this case were eyewitnesses. They clearly saw the man who attacked them, yet they mistakenly identified an innocent person. Similar incidents have occurred before. Eyewitnesses to other crimes have identified the wrong person in a police lineup or in photographs. Many factors influence the accuracy of eyewitness testimony. For instance, witnesses sometimes see photographs of several suspects before they try to identify the person they saw in a lineup of people. They can become confused by seeing many photographs or similar faces. The number of people in the lineup, and whether it is a live lineup or a photograph, may also affect a witnesss decision. People sometimes have difficulty identifying people of other races. The questions the police ask witnesses also have an effect on them.

　　Question

　　33: What do we learn about Bernard Jackson? Question

　　A) He has better memories of childhood.

B) He was accused of family violence.

C) He is a habitual criminal.

　　D) He was wrongly imprisoned.

　　34: What led directly to Jacksons sentence? Question

　　A) The jurys prejudice against his race.

B) The evidence found at the crime scene.

C) The two victims identification.

　　D) The testimony of his two friends.

　　35: What lesson do we learn from Jacksons case?

【2012年6月英语六级真题听力原文及解析】相关文章：

★ 12月英语六级听力必备实用词组（3）

★ 6月英语六级听力答案(B卷)

★ 12月六级听力新难点解析及备考建议

★ 12月英语六级考试听力备考时间表

★ 英语六级听力精讲班讲义(二)

★ 2014年6月决胜六级听力必备mode1　

★ 英语六级听力精练的第1套短文理解3

★ 12月英语六级听力短文提分技巧

★ 英语六级考试听力备考的全攻略

★ 2013年6月克服英语四级听力走神妙招