据称美国公司与FREE公司就是否为订阅链接而直接向ISP付费问题进行磋商。网络上,按惯例,类似于FREE的ISP公司向订阅者缴费用以支付网络成本,而非向内容供应商索取费用。谷歌对ISP公司称其不对网络成本直接负责的抱怨习以为常。也习惯于中国政府等政府出于政治原因封锁其服务的行为。
Freewas showing its clout by threatening to damage Googlesadvertising-driven business model in France. Mr Nielscalculation was that few of his 5m-odd customers would leave just because thedefault settings deprived them of Googles ads. Defaultsettings are quite easy to change, after all. Free is also suspected ofdeliberately choking off its subscribers connection toYouTube, Googles video-streaming service, during peakhours. YouTube takes up lots of bandwidth on the internet, especially as morepeople choose to watch Gangnam Style and Dumb Ways to Die in high definition. The telecoms regulator is investigating.
FREE公司威胁损坏谷歌在法国的广告驱动商业模式,以展现其影响力。尼尔估计公司的500完用户很少会因为默认拦截谷歌的广告而流失掉。毕竟,默认设置轻易就可以改变。FREE公司也涉嫌高峰时段故意拦截YouTube,谷歌视频流服务链接。YouTube占用大量宽带,尤其当更过的人观看高清版江南Style,蠢蠢的死法的时候。电信监管机构正在介入调查。
【2014年考研经济学人中英文对照屏蔽广告的冲击】相关文章:
最新
2016-10-18
2016-10-11
2016-10-11
2016-10-08
2016-09-30
2016-09-30