而且,在论文从投稿到出版的过程中,每一期刊的编辑都会对文章做同行评审由相关领域的专家评估就像有意购楼者在购楼前要了解楼盘一样。
And, unlike those multiple, parallelsurveys, the reviewers do not even get paid for their efforts.
而且,不像那些多重平行的调查,评审专家甚至没有劳动报酬。
Some publishers are at last beginning to twig that this is an awful waste of resources.
一些出版社终于开始意识到同行评审这一做法相当浪费资源。
Last month a number of them, including big ones like the Wellcome Trust, BioMed Central,the Public Library of Science and the European Molecular Biology Organisation,
上个月许多出版社,包括一些大型出版社,譬如维康基金会,生物医学期刊出版中心,科学公共图书馆以及欧洲分子生物学组织,
said they would give authors of papers they reject the option of making referees reportsavailable to the other publishers.
声明他们将会给予被拒文章的作者选择权,决定是否让文章的评审报告对其他出版社开放。
The practice is not unheard of within publishing groups.
这一做法在出版集团内部不是前所未闻的事。
【2015考研英语阅读同行评审机制】相关文章:
最新
2016-10-18
2016-10-11
2016-10-11
2016-10-08
2016-09-30
2016-09-30