由于很多宗教和社区医院提供慈善性的救助,他们都享有税收优惠的政策,可以发放免税证券,免收财产和收入税收等等。
avoid taxes on property and income, and so on. But investigations by the Internal RevenueService and others have revealed that many in fact provide very little charitable care, whilepaying enormous salaries or going on acquisition sprees.
但是美国国内收入署和其他一些机关的调查表明,有些医院提供很少的慈善性救助,他们所做的无非是领取高额工资,无节制地享受收益。
On this proposal, the industry may carry the day.
在这样的提案下,整个行业的反对可能会占上风。
Although the tax break is hard to defend, closing the loophole would lead to many small,weak hospitals shutting downsomething voters would be unlikely to tolerate.
尽管人们很难为税务减免而辩护,结束这样的漏洞可能会导致很多小型医院的倒闭,这正是选民们不能容忍的事情。
Even those hospitals that survived might spark a backlash.
甚至那些得以幸存的医院也会引发人们强烈的反对。
Dr Pardes argues that abolishing the tax advantages would mean higher running costs thatwould inevitably be passed through to those patients who have private insurance.
【2015考研英语阅读美国医疗行业】相关文章:
最新
2016-10-18
2016-10-11
2016-10-11
2016-10-08
2016-09-30
2016-09-30