对一个有十条真实刺鱼鱼群的初步研究显示,他们确实接纳了那条机器鱼,并且接受它的领导指示。
He is now making arobot predator to see how the shoal reacts to less benign intruders.
他现在正在制作一个机器猎食者,用来观察鱼群对凶猛入侵者的反应。
If the models are anything to go by, the bestoutcome for the groupin this case, not beingeatenseems to depend on mostmembers being blissfully unaware of the world outside theshoal and simplytaking their cue from others.
如果模型一切正常,那么就可得出对群体来说最好的结果不会被吃掉这看起来有赖于大多数成员对鱼群外部世界毫无知觉,仅仅只是接受其他鱼指示的傻鱼傻福。
This phenomenon, Dr Couzin argues, applies to allmanner of organisms, from individualcells in a tissue to voters in the democratic process.
Couzin博士指出,这个现象符合所有的组织行为,从组织中的个体单位到民主过程中的选民。
His team has already begun probing thequestion of voting patterns.
他的研究团队已经开始探索选举模式的问题。
But is ignorance really political bliss?
然而,愚昧真是政治之福吗?
DrCouzin s models do not yet capture what happens when the leaders themselvesturn out tobe sharks.
【2015考研英语阅读跟领导走】相关文章:
★ 2014年12月英语六级阅读理解真题训练:Attention
最新
2016-10-18
2016-10-11
2016-10-11
2016-10-08
2016-09-30
2016-09-30