或许最具争议的决议就是需要公司更多地明确他们政治上的支出,同时要求董事会确保所使用的资金都是以考虑股东的利益为前提而不是管理人员。
This effort is being fiercely resisted. The US Chamber of Commerce argues that theseresolutions, which mostly come from shareholders who are also trade unions or socialactivists, are not in the best interests of the firms concerned.
这方面的努力正遭到激烈的抵抗。美国商会认为这样的决议没有考虑到公司利益的最大化,而主要考虑的是股东,但或许他们还是贸易联盟或是社会激进主义分子。
Jim Copland of the Manhattan Institute, a think-tank, says that some of these proposalsmay serve primarily to chill corporate political speech broadly, including on issues that mostdiversified shareholders-as distinguished from the proposals sponsors-might prefer that thecorporation s views be heard.
智囊团吉姆柯普兰的曼哈顿学院称道,这其中的一些提议或许主要是冷却一下公司广泛政治演讲的热度。包括在一些重要议题上大多数多元化股东有别于建议的赞助商,他们更愿意听到公司的观点。
Well, maybe. But, as with the other issues on the proxy this year, that is for shareholders todecide.
嗯,也许吧。但是,今年另一个关于代理权的议题是为股东决定的。
【2015考研英语阅美国企业治理】相关文章:
最新
2016-10-18
2016-10-11
2016-10-11
2016-10-08
2016-09-30
2016-09-30